↓ Skip to main content

Mediators and Moderators of Parental Involvement on Substance Use: A National Study of Adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Prevention Science, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Mediators and Moderators of Parental Involvement on Substance Use: A National Study of Adolescents
Published in
Prevention Science, March 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11121-005-0019-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colleen C. Pilgrim, John E. Schulenberg, Patrick M. O’Malley, Jerald G. Bachman, Lloyd D. Johnston

Abstract

Current social developmental theories of drug use often incorporate mediation processes, but it is generally unknown whether these mediation processes generalize across ethnicity and gender. In the present study, we developed a mediation model of substance use based on current theory and research and then tested the extent to which the model was moderated by gender and ethnicity (African American, European American, and Hispanic American), separately for 8th and 10th graders. The respondents were adolescents from the 1994, 1995, and 1996 cohorts of the Monitoring the Future (MTF) project, which conducts yearly in-school surveys with nationally representative samples. Multi-group, structural equation modeling (SEM) results indicated much similarity across gender and ethnicity for school success and time spent with friends as partial mediators of risk taking and parental involvement on drug use (controlling for parental education). However, there were some differences in the magnitude of indirect effects of parental involvement and risk taking on substance use for 8th-grade African American girls. Discussion focuses on the potential success of prevention efforts across different ethnicities and gender that target parent-child relationship improvement and risk taking, and considers possible culture- and gender-specific issues.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 9%
Unknown 85 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Researcher 16 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 13%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 28%
Social Sciences 24 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 19 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#6,412,108
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Prevention Science
#410
of 1,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,523
of 66,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Prevention Science
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,027 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.