↓ Skip to main content

Place Rank: Valuing Spatial Interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Networks and Spatial Economics, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Place Rank: Valuing Spatial Interactions
Published in
Networks and Spatial Economics, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11067-011-9153-z
Authors

Ahmed El-Geneidy, David Levinson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Portugal 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 95 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 24%
Researcher 20 20%
Student > Master 12 12%
Professor 7 7%
Other 7 7%
Other 22 22%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 25 25%
Social Sciences 23 23%
Computer Science 11 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 10%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 15 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2017.
All research outputs
#7,942,395
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Networks and Spatial Economics
#24
of 98 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,513
of 189,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Networks and Spatial Economics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them