↓ Skip to main content

Improved Bounds for Functions Related to Busy Beavers

Overview of attention for article published in Theory of Computing Systems, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 131)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Improved Bounds for Functions Related to Busy Beavers
Published in
Theory of Computing Systems, January 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00224-001-1052-0
Authors

A. M. Ben-Amram, H. Petersen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 43%
Professor 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 2 29%
Environmental Science 1 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Physics and Astronomy 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2012.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Theory of Computing Systems
#26
of 131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,570
of 122,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theory of Computing Systems
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,844 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them