↓ Skip to main content

The historical misconception in relativistic statics

Overview of attention for article published in Il Nuovo Cimento - Section B, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
The historical misconception in relativistic statics
Published in
Il Nuovo Cimento - Section B, April 2008
DOI 10.1007/bf02874335
Authors

Hsiao-Bai Ai

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Il Nuovo Cimento - Section B
#15
of 96 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,438
of 95,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Il Nuovo Cimento - Section B
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.