↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of Online Laboratory Science Courses

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Formative Design in Learning, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy of Online Laboratory Science Courses
Published in
Journal of Formative Design in Learning, December 2017
DOI 10.1007/s41686-017-0014-0
Authors

Rebecca J. Rowe, Lori Koban, Amy J. Davidoff, Kathryn H. Thompson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 150 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Student > Master 16 11%
Lecturer 15 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Researcher 5 3%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 63 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 17 11%
Chemistry 17 11%
Computer Science 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Engineering 6 4%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 66 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2018.
All research outputs
#20,997,191
of 23,636,051 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Formative Design in Learning
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#379,271
of 443,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Formative Design in Learning
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,636,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them