↓ Skip to main content

Dutch Surgery in Japan

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, December 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Dutch Surgery in Japan
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, December 2004
DOI 10.1007/s00268-004-7549-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas M. van Gulik, Yuji Nimura

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 36%
Student > Bachelor 3 27%
Professor 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 3 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 27%
Environmental Science 1 9%
Psychology 1 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2023.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#1,498
of 4,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,033
of 140,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.