↓ Skip to main content

Teaching the science of learning

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 373)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
8063 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
631 Mendeley
Title
Teaching the science of learning
Published in
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s41235-017-0087-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yana Weinstein, Christopher R. Madan, Megan A. Sumeracki

Abstract

The science of learning has made a considerable contribution to our understanding of effective teaching and learning strategies. However, few instructors outside of the field are privy to this research. In this tutorial review, we focus on six specific cognitive strategies that have received robust support from decades of research: spaced practice, interleaving, retrieval practice, elaboration, concrete examples, and dual coding. We describe the basic research behind each strategy and relevant applied research, present examples of existing and suggested implementation, and make recommendations for further research that would broaden the reach of these strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8,063 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 631 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 631 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 79 13%
Student > Bachelor 67 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 10%
Researcher 53 8%
Lecturer 29 5%
Other 128 20%
Unknown 211 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 82 13%
Social Sciences 60 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 6%
Computer Science 21 3%
Neuroscience 19 3%
Other 169 27%
Unknown 243 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 768. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#25,834
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#3
of 373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#530
of 452,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 373 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them