| Title |
Revision Rhinoplasty Using Porous High-Density Polyethylene Implants to Reestablish Ethnic Identity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, November 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00266-006-0049-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Romo, Edward S. Kwak, Anthony P. Sclafani |
| Abstract |
This study aimed to evaluate a surgical technique used for patients requiring revision rhinoplasty to reestablish their ethnic identity. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 15 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 19% |
| Professor | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 81% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
#278
of 1,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,342
of 69,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,210 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.