↓ Skip to main content

New insights into perinatal testicular torsion

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
New insights into perinatal testicular torsion
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, October 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00431-009-1096-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Piet R. H. Callewaert, Philip Van Kerrebroeck

Abstract

Perinatal testicular torsion is a relatively rare event that remains unrecognized in many patients or is suspected and treated accordingly only after an avoidable loss of time. The authors report their own experience with several patients, some of them quite atypical but instructive. Missed bilateral torsion is an issue, as are partial torsion, possible antenatal signs, and late presentation. These data are discussed together with the existing literature and may help shed new light on the natural course of testicular torsion and its treatment. The most important conclusion is that a much higher index of suspicion based on clinical findings is needed for timely detection of perinatal torsion. It is the authors' opinion that immediate surgery is mandatory not only in suspected bilateral torsions but also in cases of possible unilateral torsions. There is no place for a more fatalistic "wait-and-see" approach. Whenever possible, even necrotic testes should not be removed during surgery because some endocrine function may be retained.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Nigeria 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 8 16%
Other 7 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 72%
Computer Science 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#1,457
of 3,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,846
of 94,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.