↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of psychological treatments for clinical anxiety during the perinatal period

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Women's Mental Health, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
257 Mendeley
Title
A systematic review of psychological treatments for clinical anxiety during the perinatal period
Published in
Archives of Women's Mental Health, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00737-018-0812-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Siobhan A. Loughnan, Matthew Wallace, Amy E. Joubert, Hila Haskelberg, Gavin Andrews, Jill M. Newby

Abstract

Maternal anxiety is common during the perinatal period, and despite the negative outcomes of anxiety on the mother and infant, its treatment has received limited attention. This paper describes the first review of psychological interventions for clinical anxiety during the perinatal period. A systematic search was carried out of six electronic databases. Five studies which evaluated psychological interventions for clinical anxiety in perinatal women were identified. Of the five studies included, four were open trials and one was a randomised controlled trial. Three studies evaluated group-based interventions; one study evaluated an online-delivered intervention; and one study a combined pharmacologic-psychological intervention. All participants demonstrated significant reductions in anxiety symptom severity from pre- to post-treatment. However, this review was limited to published literature evaluating treatments for clinical anxiety in perinatal women, which may have excluded important intervention studies and prevention programs, and unpublished literature. This review identifies an area of research that needs urgent attention, as very few studies have evaluated psychological treatments for perinatal anxiety. The studies included in this review demonstrate that symptoms of anxiety during the perinatal period appear to improve during treatment. Future research is needed to establish the efficacy of perinatal anxiety interventions in randomised controlled trials, whether reductions persist long term and whether benefits extend to other outcomes for the mother, infant and family.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 257 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 11%
Student > Bachelor 28 11%
Researcher 22 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 45 18%
Unknown 88 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 70 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 11%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Unspecified 5 2%
Other 25 10%
Unknown 93 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2018.
All research outputs
#6,213,067
of 23,983,367 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#365
of 963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,877
of 447,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#10
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,983,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 963 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.