| Title |
Resonant Frequency Biofeedback Training to Increase Cardiac Variability: Rationale and Manual for Training
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, September 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1009554825745 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul M. Lehrer, Evgeny Vaschillo, Bronya Vaschillo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 454 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Poland | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 432 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 82 | 18% |
| Researcher | 69 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 67 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 53 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 34 | 7% |
| Other | 70 | 15% |
| Unknown | 79 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 157 | 35% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 27 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 21 | 5% |
| Other | 89 | 20% |
| Unknown | 100 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,694,003
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#44
of 466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,184
of 38,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them