Title |
Developing Priorities for Addressing Surgical Conditions Globally: Furthering the Link Between Surgery and Public Health Policy
|
---|---|
Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, October 2009
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00268-009-0263-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Charles Mock, Meena Cherian, Catherine Juillard, Peter Donkor, Stephen Bickler, Dean Jamison, Kelly McQueen |
Abstract |
Efforts to promote wider access to surgical services globally would be aided by developing consensus among clinicians, the public health policy community, and other stakeholders as to which surgical conditions warrant the most focused attention and investment. This would add value to other, ongoing efforts, especially in helping to define unmet need and effective coverage. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
Kenya | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Egypt | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 99 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 21 | 20% |
Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
Other | 28 | 27% |
Unknown | 11 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 62% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 19 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#2,222,725
of 23,755,107 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#285
of 4,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,442
of 96,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,755,107 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.