↓ Skip to main content

Rupture of the conjoint tendon at the proximal musculotendinous junction of the biceps femoris long head: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Rupture of the conjoint tendon at the proximal musculotendinous junction of the biceps femoris long head: a case report
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, March 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00167-008-0517-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony G. Schache, George Koulouris, Warren Kofoed, Hayden G. Morris, Marcus G. Pandy

Abstract

This case report describes a 20-year-old elite-level Australian Rules football player who suffered three unilateral hamstring injuries within a 2 month period. The first two episodes were managed conservatively. Magnetic resonance imaging following the third episode revealed full thickness disruption of the proximal musculotendinous junction of the biceps femoris long head and semitendinosus muscles and the common proximal (conjoint) tendon. The injury was subsequently surgically repaired. At 16 months following surgery, the player had successfully completed a full competitive season of elite-level Australian Rules football symptom free. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated the repaired tendon to be uniformly hypointense in keeping with reparative granulation tissue formation and restoration of normal muscle morphology. These findings are consistent with an intact repair. The case demonstrates that complete functional and radiological resolution is possible following surgical repair of significant hamstring musculotendinous junction tears.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 58 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 4 7%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 20 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 28%
Sports and Recreations 15 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Engineering 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 21 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2022.
All research outputs
#7,503,741
of 22,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#1,009
of 2,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,634
of 81,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.