↓ Skip to main content

The phenomenological role of affect in the Capgras delusion

Overview of attention for article published in Continental Philosophy Review, June 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 203)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
The phenomenological role of affect in the Capgras delusion
Published in
Continental Philosophy Review, June 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11007-008-9078-5
Authors

Matthew Ratcliffe

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Israel 1 4%
Unknown 21 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 30%
Lecturer 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Other 2 9%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 9 39%
Psychology 9 39%
Arts and Humanities 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Continental Philosophy Review
#33
of 203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,652
of 82,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Continental Philosophy Review
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 203 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,352 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.