↓ Skip to main content

Cervicothoracoscopic Approach in Esophagectomy

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Cervicothoracoscopic Approach in Esophagectomy
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, October 2017
DOI 10.1245/s10434-017-6119-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akihiko Okamura, Masayuki Watanabe, Yu Imamura, Masaru Hayami, Masami Yuda, Kotaro Yamashita, Yoshiaki Shoji, Shinji Mine

Abstract

Esophageal cancer frequently metastasizes to lymph nodes along the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN).1 Therefore, it is essential to dissect RLN nodes for curative esophagectomy. Complete RLN node dissection without injury to the organs at the cervicothoracic junction requires experienced techniques. This report describes the cervicothoracoscopic approach, whereby the complete dissection can be safely performed. With this approach, both cervical and laparoscopic procedures are performed in the open-leg supine position before the thoracoscopic procedure is performed in the prone position. For RLN node dissection, the paratracheal lymphatic chain is detached from RLNs at the cervicothoracic junction in the cervical operation field, and the detached tissue is retrieved together with the mediastinal RLN lymph nodes via thoracoscopy. This approach was applied to all squamous cell carcinoma patients and to patients with Siewert type 1 tumors of stage 2 or more, except for patients with clinically suspected T4 tumors. Of 91 patients, 27 (29.7%) experienced RLN palsy and 15 (16.5%) experienced postoperative pneumonia. Hoarseness due to RLN palsy was improved in almost all the patients within 6 postoperative months, and persistent paralysis was seldom observed. Within 30 days, neither a reoperation nor a hospital mortality occurred. The cervicothoracoscopic approach enables complete en bloc dissection of the lymphatic chain that lies along RLN in the cervicothoracic junction. Also, with this approach, RLNs can be identified easily because RLNs are already exposed at the upper mediastinum by the cervical procedure. Therefore, this approach may contribute to improving the surgical curability and preventing RLN injury.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Student > Master 2 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Unspecified 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Unspecified 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2018.
All research outputs
#14,090,698
of 23,018,998 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#4,038
of 6,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,679
of 328,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#61
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,018,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.