You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Are patients in heart failure trials representative of primary care populations? A systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
BJGP Open, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.3399/bjgpopen18x101337 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nicholas D Gollop, John Ford, Pieter Mackeith, Caroline Thurlow, Rachel Wakelin, Nicholas Steel, Robert Fleetcroft |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 25% |
Spain | 4 | 20% |
Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 70% |
Scientists | 3 | 15% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 13% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 20% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
Psychology | 1 | 7% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 13% |
Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,727,923
of 24,041,016 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#104
of 551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,704
of 447,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,041,016 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.