↓ Skip to main content

Electrophysiological correlates of incidentally learned expectations in human vision

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurophysiology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Electrophysiological correlates of incidentally learned expectations in human vision
Published in
Journal of Neurophysiology, January 2018
DOI 10.1152/jn.00733.2017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle G Hall, Jason B Mattingley, Paul E Dux

Abstract

The human visual system is remarkably sensitive to environmental regularities, which can facilitate behavioural performance when sensory events conform to past experience. The point at which prior knowledge is integrated during visual perception is unclear, particularly for incidentally learned associations. One possibility is that expectation shapes neural activity prospectively, in an anticipatory fashion, allowing prior knowledge to affect the earliest stages of sensory processing. Alternatively, cognitive processes underlying object recognition and conflict detection may be necessary precursors, constraining effects to later stages of processing. Here we used electroencephalography (EEG) to uncover neural activity that distinguishes between visual stimuli that match prior exposure from those that deviate from it. Participants identified visual targets that were associated with possible target locations; each location was associated with a high probability target and a low probability target. Alongside a behavioural cost for stimuli that had occurred infrequently at a cued location, compared with those that had occurred frequently, we observed a focal modulation of the evoked EEG response at 250ms following target onset. Relative to likely targets, unlikely targets evoked an enhanced negativity at midline frontal electrodes, and individual differences in the magnitude of this effect were correlated with the response time difference between likely and unlikely targets. In contrast, the evoked response at the latency of the P1, a correlate of early sensory processing, was indistinguishable for likely and unlikely targets. Together, these results point to post-perceptual processes as a key stage at which experience modulates visual processing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 21%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Researcher 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 10 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 27%
Neuroscience 5 15%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 10 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,698,342
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurophysiology
#841
of 8,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,781
of 451,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurophysiology
#11
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,425 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.