| Title |
Chinese Children's Comprehension of Count-Classifiers and Mass-Classifiers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of East Asian Linguistics, April 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1022401006521 |
| Authors |
Yu-Chin Chien, Barbara Lust, Chi-Pang Chiang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Uganda | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 57 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 22% |
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 7 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Linguistics | 44 | 75% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 6 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2014.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of East Asian Linguistics
#9
of 119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,903
of 63,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of East Asian Linguistics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them