↓ Skip to main content

東北を走る701系電車の現状と問題点-地方において分割・民営化の理念は活かされているか

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT PROBLEMS AND HUMAN RIGHTS, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
28 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
東北を走る701系電車の現状と問題点-地方において分割・民営化の理念は活かされているか
Published in
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT PROBLEMS AND HUMAN RIGHTS, April 2017
DOI 10.20611/kotsuken.1997.15_27
Authors

鈴木 一夫

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,408,925
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT PROBLEMS AND HUMAN RIGHTS
#1
of 23 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,154
of 324,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT PROBLEMS AND HUMAN RIGHTS
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one scored the same or higher as 22 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.