↓ Skip to main content

Inverse vs. classical calibration for small data sets

Overview of attention for article published in Fresenius' Journal of Analytical Chemistry, November 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 134)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Inverse vs. classical calibration for small data sets
Published in
Fresenius' Journal of Analytical Chemistry, November 2000
DOI 10.1007/s002160000556
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Tellinghuisen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 41 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 24%
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Professor 3 7%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 5 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 18 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 13%
Environmental Science 4 9%
Mathematics 2 4%
Materials Science 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Fresenius' Journal of Analytical Chemistry
#38
of 134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,810
of 41,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fresenius' Journal of Analytical Chemistry
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.