↓ Skip to main content

Morphometric analysis of chameleon fossil fragments from the Early Pliocene of South Africa: a new piece of the chamaeleonid history

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Morphometric analysis of chameleon fossil fragments from the Early Pliocene of South Africa: a new piece of the chamaeleonid history
Published in
The Science of Nature, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00114-014-1254-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexis Y. Dollion, Raphaël Cornette, Krystal A. Tolley, Renaud Boistel, Adelaïde Euriat, Elodie Boller, Vincent Fernandez, Deano Stynder, Anthony Herrel

Abstract

The evolutionary history of chameleons has been predominantly studied through phylogenetic approaches as the fossil register of chameleons is limited and fragmented. The poor state of preservation of these fossils has moreover led to the origin of numerous nomen dubia, and the identification of many chameleon fossils remains uncertain. We here examine chameleon fossil fragments from the Early Pliocene Varswater formation, exposed at the locality of Langebaanweg "E" Quarry along the southwestern coast of South Africa. Our aim was to explore whether these fossil fragments could be assigned to extant genera. To do so, we used geometric morphometric approaches based on microtomographic imaging of extant chameleons as well as the fossil fragments themselves. Our study suggests that the fossils from this deposit most likely represent at least two different forms that may belong to different genera. Most fragments are phenotypically dissimilar from the South African endemic genus Bradypodion and are more similar to other chameleon genera such as Trioceros or Kinyongia. However, close phenetic similarities between some of the fragments and the Seychelles endemic Archaius or the Madagascan genus Furcifer suggest that some of these fragments may not contain enough genus-specific information to allow correct identification. Other fragments such as the parietal fragments appear to contain more genus-specific information, however. Although our data suggest that the fossil diversity of chameleons in South Africa was potentially greater than it is today, this remains to be verified based on other and more complete fragments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Germany 1 3%
Italy 1 3%
Unknown 37 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 10 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 43%
Environmental Science 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2015.
All research outputs
#15,517,694
of 25,047,899 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#1,851
of 2,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,606
of 363,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,047,899 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.