Title |
Morphometric analysis of chameleon fossil fragments from the Early Pliocene of South Africa: a new piece of the chamaeleonid history
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Science of Nature, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00114-014-1254-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alexis Y. Dollion, Raphaël Cornette, Krystal A. Tolley, Renaud Boistel, Adelaïde Euriat, Elodie Boller, Vincent Fernandez, Deano Stynder, Anthony Herrel |
Abstract |
The evolutionary history of chameleons has been predominantly studied through phylogenetic approaches as the fossil register of chameleons is limited and fragmented. The poor state of preservation of these fossils has moreover led to the origin of numerous nomen dubia, and the identification of many chameleon fossils remains uncertain. We here examine chameleon fossil fragments from the Early Pliocene Varswater formation, exposed at the locality of Langebaanweg "E" Quarry along the southwestern coast of South Africa. Our aim was to explore whether these fossil fragments could be assigned to extant genera. To do so, we used geometric morphometric approaches based on microtomographic imaging of extant chameleons as well as the fossil fragments themselves. Our study suggests that the fossils from this deposit most likely represent at least two different forms that may belong to different genera. Most fragments are phenotypically dissimilar from the South African endemic genus Bradypodion and are more similar to other chameleon genera such as Trioceros or Kinyongia. However, close phenetic similarities between some of the fragments and the Seychelles endemic Archaius or the Madagascan genus Furcifer suggest that some of these fragments may not contain enough genus-specific information to allow correct identification. Other fragments such as the parietal fragments appear to contain more genus-specific information, however. Although our data suggest that the fossil diversity of chameleons in South Africa was potentially greater than it is today, this remains to be verified based on other and more complete fragments. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 3% |
Germany | 1 | 3% |
Italy | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 37 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 8 | 20% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 10 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 43% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 8% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 30% |