↓ Skip to main content

Ideal Worlds — Wishful Thinking in Deontic Logic

Overview of attention for article published in Studia Logica, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 306)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Ideal Worlds — Wishful Thinking in Deontic Logic
Published in
Studia Logica, April 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11225-006-8100-3
Authors

Sven Ove Hansson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Canada 1 6%
Brazil 1 6%
Unknown 14 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 11 65%
Social Sciences 2 12%
Decision Sciences 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Unknown 2 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2014.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,782,096 outputs
Outputs from Studia Logica
#35
of 306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,439
of 66,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Studia Logica
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,782,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 306 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them