↓ Skip to main content

Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of iron deficiency and anemia in inflammatory bowel diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
379 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of iron deficiency and anemia in inflammatory bowel diseases
Published in
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, November 2007
DOI 10.1002/ibd.20285
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christoph Gasche, Arnold Berstad, Ragnar Befrits, Christoph Beglinger, Axel Dignass, Kari Erichsen, Fernando Gomollon, Henrik Hjortswang, Ioannis Koutroubakis, Stefanie Kulnigg, Bas Oldenburg, David Rampton, Oliver Schroeder, Jürgen Stein, Simon Travis, Gert Van Assche

Abstract

Anemia is a common complication of inflammatory bowel diseases. An international working party has formed and developed guidelines for evaluation and treatment of anemia and iron deficiency that should serve practicing gastroenterologists. Within a total of 16 statements, recommendations are made regarding diagnostic measures to screen for iron- and other anemia-related deficiencies regarding the triggers for medical intervention, treatment goals, and appropriate therapies. Anemia is a common cause of hospitalization, prevents physicians from discharging hospitalized patients, and is one of the most frequent comorbid conditions in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. It therefore needs appropriate attention and specific care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
United States 3 1%
Russia 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 249 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 16%
Other 35 13%
Researcher 31 12%
Student > Postgraduate 24 9%
Student > Bachelor 22 8%
Other 70 27%
Unknown 39 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 142 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 25 10%
Unknown 48 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,355,005
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
#1,464
of 3,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,789
of 90,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
#11
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.