You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of cognitive–behavioral therapy for tinnitus distress
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Psychology Review, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.12.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hugo Hesser, Cornelia Weise, Vendela Zetterqvist Westin, Gerhard Andersson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 301 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 70 | 23% |
| Researcher | 40 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 8% |
| Other | 52 | 17% |
| Unknown | 54 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 76 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 37 | 12% |
| Unknown | 67 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2020.
All research outputs
#5,284,655
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Psychology Review
#953
of 1,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,844
of 196,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Psychology Review
#9
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.9. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.