↓ Skip to main content

High- and low-molecular-mass microbial surfactants

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, August 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
589 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
473 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
High- and low-molecular-mass microbial surfactants
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, August 1999
DOI 10.1007/s002530051502
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Rosenberg, E. Z. Ron

Abstract

Microorganisms synthesize a wide variety of high- and low-molecular-mass bioemulsifiers. The low-molecular-mass bioemulsifiers are generally glycolipids, such as trehalose lipids, sophorolipids and rhamnolipids, or lipopeptides, such as surfactin, gramicidin S and polymyxin. The high-molecular-mass bioemulsifiers are amphipathic polysaccharides, proteins, lipopolysaccharides, lipoproteins or complex mixtures of these biopolymers. The low-molecular-mass bioemulsifiers lower surface and interfacial tensions, whereas the higher-molecular-mass bioemulsifiers are more effective at stabilizing oil-in-water emulsions. Three natural roles for bioemulsifiers have been proposed: (i) increasing the surface area of hydrophobic water-insoluble growth substrates; (ii) increasing the bioavailability of hydrophobic substrates by increasing their apparent solubility or desorbing them from surfaces; (iii) regulating the attachment and detachment of microorganisms to and from surfaces. Bioemulsifiers have several important advantages over chemical surfactants, which should allow them to become prominent in industrial and environmental applications. The potential commercial applications of bioemulsifiers include bioremediation of oil-polluted soil and water, enhanced oil recovery, replacement of chlorinated solvents used in cleaning-up oil-contaminated pipes, vessels and machinery, use in the detergent industry, formulations of herbicides and pesticides and formation of stable oil-in-water emulsions for the food and cosmetic industries.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 473 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 3 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Poland 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 452 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 15%
Student > Master 65 14%
Student > Bachelor 65 14%
Researcher 53 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 6%
Other 76 16%
Unknown 112 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 120 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 57 12%
Chemistry 32 7%
Chemical Engineering 30 6%
Engineering 29 6%
Other 64 14%
Unknown 141 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2022.
All research outputs
#3,798,611
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#589
of 8,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,831
of 34,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#4
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,290 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 34,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.