↓ Skip to main content

Cytoarchitectonic mapping of the human amygdala, hippocampal region and entorhinal cortex: intersubject variability and probability maps

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Structure and Function, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
14 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1077 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
810 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Cytoarchitectonic mapping of the human amygdala, hippocampal region and entorhinal cortex: intersubject variability and probability maps
Published in
Brain Structure and Function, October 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00429-005-0025-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. Amunts, O. Kedo, M. Kindler, P. Pieperhoff, H. Mohlberg, N.J. Shah, U. Habel, F. Schneider, K. Zilles

Abstract

Probabilistic maps of neocortical areas and subcortical fiber tracts, warped to a common reference brain, have been published using microscopic architectonic parcellations in ten human postmortem brains. The maps have been successfully applied as topographical references for the anatomical localization of activations observed in functional imaging studies. Here, for the first time, we present stereotaxic, probabilistic maps of the hippocampus, the amygdala and the entorhinal cortex and some of their subdivisions. Cytoarchitectonic mapping was performed in serial, cell-body stained histological sections. The positions and the extent of cytoarchitectonically defined structures were traced in digitized histological sections, 3-D reconstructed and warped to the reference space of the MNI single subject brain using both linear and non-linear elastic tools of alignment. The probability maps and volumes of all structures were calculated. The precise localization of the borders of the mapped regions cannot be predicted consistently by macroanatomical landmarks. Many borders, e.g. between the subiculum and entorhinal cortex, subiculum and Cornu ammonis, and amygdala and hippocampus, do not match sulcal landmarks such as the bottom of a sulcus. Only microscopic observation enables the precise localization of the borders of these brain regions. The superposition of the cytoarchitectonic maps in the common spatial reference system shows a considerably lower degree of intersubject variability in size and position of the allocortical structures and nuclei than the previously delineated neocortical areas. For the first time, the present observations provide cytoarchitectonically verified maps of the human amygdala, hippocampus and entorhinal cortex, which take into account the stereotaxic position of the brain structures as well as intersubject variability. We believe that these maps are efficient tools for the precise microstructural localization of fMRI, PET and anatomical MR data, both in healthy and pathologically altered brains.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 810 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 2%
Netherlands 7 <1%
Germany 6 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Norway 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 5 <1%
Unknown 764 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 183 23%
Researcher 161 20%
Student > Master 77 10%
Student > Bachelor 76 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 56 7%
Other 148 18%
Unknown 109 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 190 23%
Neuroscience 142 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 104 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 98 12%
Engineering 30 4%
Other 78 10%
Unknown 168 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,959,162
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Brain Structure and Function
#618
of 2,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,229
of 71,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Structure and Function
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,021 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.