↓ Skip to main content

William Macewen [1848–1924]

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
William Macewen [1848–1924]
Published in
Journal of Neurology, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00415-010-5524-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Malcolm Macmillan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 60%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#1,770
of 4,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,436
of 94,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.