↓ Skip to main content

IR-MALDESI method optimization based on time-resolved measurement of ion yields

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
IR-MALDESI method optimization based on time-resolved measurement of ion yields
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00216-017-0585-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Måns Ekelöf, David C. Muddiman

Abstract

In the field of mass spectrometry imaging, typical experiments involve ionization directly from complex samples with no pre-ionization separation, relying on high resolving power mass analyzers to separate ions of interest. When an ion trapping step is involved in the analysis, the dynamic range of the analysis may be limited by the capacity of the ion trap, which is easily exceeded. To minimize collection of undesired ambient species while maximizing collection of analyte signal, accurate timing between ion generation and collection is a requirement. Here, a method for achieving synchronicity between infrared laser ablation and ion collection on a Q Exactive Plus mass spectrometer is described and demonstrated through measurement of ion accumulation at fixed time points following a laser ablation event with electrospray post-ionization of ablated material. In a model imaging experiment using infrared matrix-assisted laser desorption electrospray ionization, fixing the injection time at the minimum duration required to capture all ions generated by the last laser pulse in a sequence is shown to maximize target ion abundances. Using optimized timing is shown to yield a doubling or better of useful signal compared to previously used parameters. Graphical abstract Illustration of the effects of signal optimization on data quality for a single lipid species (cholesterol) measured from mouse liver tissue.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 38%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 7 44%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Computer Science 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2018.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#6,061
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,307
of 323,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#64
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.