↓ Skip to main content

Geochemical Discrimination of Five Pleistocene Lava‐Dam Outburst‐Flood Deposits, Western Grand Canyon, Arizona

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Geology, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Geochemical Discrimination of Five Pleistocene Lava‐Dam Outburst‐Flood Deposits, Western Grand Canyon, Arizona
Published in
The Journal of Geology, January 2004
DOI 10.1086/379694
Authors

Cassandra R. Fenton, Robert J. Poreda, Barbara P. Nash, Robert H. Webb, Thure E. Cerling

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 14%
Unknown 24 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Professor 3 11%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 61%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 14%
Mathematics 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 5 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,409,093
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Geology
#96
of 599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,337
of 132,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Geology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them