↓ Skip to main content

Combining professional and lay knowledge to improve patient care

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Combining professional and lay knowledge to improve patient care
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, December 2017
DOI 10.3399/bjgp17x694337
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charlotte Williamson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Unknown 10 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 12%
Social Sciences 2 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2021.
All research outputs
#14,374,036
of 23,018,998 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#3,122
of 4,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,130
of 441,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#65
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,018,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.