↓ Skip to main content

The peculiar architectonics of contour feathers of the emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae, Struthioniformes)

Overview of attention for article published in Doklady Botanical Sciences, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
The peculiar architectonics of contour feathers of the emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae, Struthioniformes)
Published in
Doklady Botanical Sciences, April 2009
DOI 10.1134/s0012496609020264
Authors

O. F. Chernova, E. O. Fadeeva

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 67%
Environmental Science 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2024.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Doklady Botanical Sciences
#73
of 308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,944
of 104,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Doklady Botanical Sciences
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.