↓ Skip to main content

Advancing biotechnology with CRISPR/Cas9: recent applications and patent landscape

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 1,612)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Advancing biotechnology with CRISPR/Cas9: recent applications and patent landscape
Published in
Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10295-017-2000-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raphael Ferreira, Florian David, Jens Nielsen

Abstract

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) is poised to become one of the key scientific discoveries of the twenty-first century. Originating from prokaryotic and archaeal immune systems to counter phage invasions, CRISPR-based applications have been tailored for manipulating a broad range of living organisms. From the different elucidated types of CRISPR mechanisms, the type II system adapted from Streptococcus pyogenes has been the most exploited as a tool for genome engineering and gene regulation. In this review, we describe the different applications of CRISPR/Cas9 technology in the industrial biotechnology field. Next, we detail the current status of the patent landscape, highlighting its exploitation through different companies, and conclude with future perspectives of this technology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 152 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 14%
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 41 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 52 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 16%
Engineering 8 5%
Computer Science 4 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 40 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,846,631
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology
#17
of 1,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,846
of 341,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,612 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.