↓ Skip to main content

Complex signatures of natural selection at GYPA

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Complex signatures of natural selection at GYPA
Published in
Human Genetics, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00439-018-1866-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abigail W. Bigham, Kevin Magnaye, Diane M. Dunn, Robert B. Weiss, Michael Bamshad

Abstract

The human MN blood group antigens are isoforms of glycophorin A (GPA) encoded by the gene, GYPA, and are the most abundant erythrocyte sialoglycoproteins. The distribution of MN antigens has been widely studied in human populations yet the evolutionary and/or demographic factors affecting population variation remain elusive. While the primary function of GPA is yet to be discovered, it serves as the major binding site for the 175-kD erythrocyte-binding antigen (EB-175) of the malarial parasite, Plasmodium falciparum, a major selective pressure in recent human history. More specifically, exon two of GYPA encodes the receptor-binding ligand to which P. falciparum binds. Accordingly, there has been keen interest in understanding what impact, if any, natural selection has had on the distribution of variation in GYPA and exon two in particular. To this end, we resequenced GYPA in individuals sampled from both P. falciparum endemic (sub-Saharan Africa and South India) and non-endemic (Europe and East Asia) regions of the world. Observed patterns of variation suggest that GYPA has been subject to balancing selection in populations living in malaria endemic areas and in Europeans, but no such evidence was found in samples from East Asia, Oceania, and the Americas. These results are consistent with malaria acting as a selective pressure on GYPA, but also suggest that another selective force has resulted in a similar pattern of variation in Europeans. Accordingly, GYPA has perhaps a more complex evolutionary history, wherein on a global scale, spatially varying selective pressures have governed its natural history.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 24%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Professor 3 9%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 9%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2019.
All research outputs
#14,280,301
of 23,330,477 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#2,448
of 2,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,632
of 442,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,330,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,983 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.