↓ Skip to main content

Local Molecular Clocks in Three Nuclear Genes: Divergence Times for Rodents and Other Mammals and Incompatibility Among Fossil Calibrations

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, August 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
Title
Local Molecular Clocks in Three Nuclear Genes: Divergence Times for Rodents and Other Mammals and Incompatibility Among Fossil Calibrations
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, August 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00239-003-0028-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emmanuel J. P. Douzery, Fr�d�ric Delsuc, Michael J. Stanhope, Doroth�e Huchon

Abstract

Reconstructing the chronology of mammalian evolution is a debated issue between molecule- and fossil-based inferences. A methodological limitation of molecules is the evolutionary rate variation among lineages, precluding the application of the global molecular clock. We considered 2422 first and second codon positions of the combined ADRA2B, IRBP, and vWF nuclear genes for a well-documented set of placentals including an extensive sampling of rodents. Using seven independent calibration points and a maximum-likelihood framework, we evaluated whether molecular and paleontological estimates of mammalian divergence dates may be reconciled by the local molecular clocks approach, allowing local constancy of substitution rates with variations at larger phylogenetic scales. To handle the difficulty of choosing among all possible rate assignments for various lineages, local molecular clocks were based on the results of branch-length and two-cluster tests. Extensive lineage-specific variation of evolutionary rates was detected, even among rodents. Cross-calibrations indicated some incompatibilities between divergence dates based on different paleontological references. To decrease the impact of a single calibration point, estimates derived from independent calibrations displaying only slight reciprocal incompatibility were averaged. The divergence dates inferred for the split between mice and rats (approximately 13-19 Myr) was younger than previously published molecular estimates. The most recent common ancestors of rodents, primates and rodents, boreoeutherians, and placentals were estimated to be, respectively, approximately 60, 70, 75, and 78 Myr old. Global clocks, local clocks, and quartet dating analyses suggested a Late Cretaceous origin of the crown placental clades followed by a Tertiary radiation of some placental orders like rodents.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 4 3%
United States 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 120 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 25%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Professor 10 7%
Other 24 18%
Unknown 5 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 95 70%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 10%
Environmental Science 5 4%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 6 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,781,900
of 23,323,574 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#111
of 1,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,013
of 49,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#5
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,323,574 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,461 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.