↓ Skip to main content

Selection and identification of transferrin receptor-specific peptides as recognition probes for cancer cells

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Selection and identification of transferrin receptor-specific peptides as recognition probes for cancer cells
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00216-017-0664-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuyu Tan, Wenli Liu, Zhi Zhu, Lijun Lang, Junxia Wang, Mengjiao Huang, Mingxia Zhang, Chaoyong Yang

Abstract

Since the transferrin receptor (CD71 or TFRC) is known to be highly expressed in numerous cancers, CD71 has become an attractive target in cancer research. Acquiring specific molecular probes for CD71, such as small molecular ligands, aptamers, peptides, or antibodies, is of great importance for cancer cell recognition and capture. In this work, we chose CD71 as the target for phage display, and after four rounds of positive selection and one round of negative selection, the specific phage library was enriched. After verification and sequence analysis, six peptides were identified to be able to bind to CD71 with high specificity. The specific recognition of the CD71-positive cells was confirmed by flow cytometry and confocal microscopy. Competition experiments demonstrated that peptide Y1 and transferrin (TF) were bound to distinct sites on CD71, indicating that peptide Y1 could replace TF as a potential probe for cell imaging and drug delivery, thus avoiding competition by endogenous TF and side effects. Graphical abstract Six peptides were successfully isolated using in vitro biopanning against CD71 with high specificity and affinity. Peptides Y1 and Y2 would be powerful tools in biosensors and biomedicine due to their unique properties.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Researcher 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Other 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 13 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 24%
Chemistry 5 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 14 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2022.
All research outputs
#7,780,614
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#1,786
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,595
of 336,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#17
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.