↓ Skip to main content

Gastric-and-intestinal mixed-type intestinal metaplasia: aberrant expression of transcription factors and stem cell intestinalization

Overview of attention for article published in Gastric Cancer, August 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Gastric-and-intestinal mixed-type intestinal metaplasia: aberrant expression of transcription factors and stem cell intestinalization
Published in
Gastric Cancer, August 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10120-006-0375-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tetsuya Tsukamoto, Tsutomu Mizoshita, Masae Tatematsu

Abstract

Helicobacter pylori plays a causative role in the development of chronic atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia (IM), and stomach cancer. Although IM has long attracted attention as a putative preneoplastic lesion for stomach cancers, its clinicopathologic significance has yet to be clarified in detail. Using gastric and intestinal epithelial cell markers, IM was here divided into two major types: a gastric-and-intestinal (GI) mixed type and a solely intestinal (I) type. In the former, gastric and intestinal phenotypic markers appeared not only at the glandular but also at the cellular level. Furthermore, neuroendocrine cells also showed intestinalization along with their exocrine counterparts. In animal models, GI-type IM was found to appear first, followed by the solely I type. Summarizing these data, it was suggested that IM might be caused by the gradual intestinalization of stem cells from the GI to the I type. The molecular mechanisms of IM include the ectopic expression of CDX1, CDX2, OCT-1, and members of the Erk pathway. Suppression of the expression of gastric transcription factors such as SOX2, genes that are involved in the Sonic hedgehog pathway, and RUNX3, a tumor suppressor gene, could be additional relevant alterations. The expression of PDX1 may also be associated with pseudopyloric gland metaplasia and IM. Detailed analysis of gene regulation may shed light on the molecular bases of gastric lesions, leading to strategies for chemoprevention.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 28%
Researcher 7 15%
Professor 5 11%
Other 3 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 17%
Unspecified 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 8 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Gastric Cancer
#166
of 639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,664
of 90,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastric Cancer
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 639 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them