↓ Skip to main content

Advances in the Study of Feeding Behaviors, Mechanisms, and Mechanics of Sharks

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Biology of Fishes, February 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
147 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
311 Mendeley
Title
Advances in the Study of Feeding Behaviors, Mechanisms, and Mechanics of Sharks
Published in
Environmental Biology of Fishes, February 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1007649900712
Authors

Philip J. Motta, Cheryl D. Wilga

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 311 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Cuba 1 <1%
Other 9 3%
Unknown 286 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 20%
Researcher 61 20%
Student > Bachelor 51 16%
Student > Master 50 16%
Other 11 4%
Other 29 9%
Unknown 47 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 191 61%
Environmental Science 35 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 19 6%
Engineering 3 <1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 <1%
Other 14 5%
Unknown 47 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2023.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Biology of Fishes
#493
of 1,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,233
of 113,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Biology of Fishes
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,763 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.