↓ Skip to main content

Location, number and morphology of parathyroid glands: results from a large anatomical series

Overview of attention for article published in Anatomical Science International, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 239)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Location, number and morphology of parathyroid glands: results from a large anatomical series
Published in
Anatomical Science International, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12565-012-0142-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dimitrios Lappas, George Noussios, Panagiotis Anagnostis, Fotini Adamidou, Antonios Chatzigeorgiou, Panagiotis Skandalakis

Abstract

Surgical management of parathyroid gland disease may sometimes be difficult, due mainly to the surgeon's failure to successfully detect parathyroids in unusual locations. The records of 942 cadavers (574 men and 368 women) who underwent autopsy in the Department of Forensic Medicine in Athens during the period 1988-2009 were reviewed. In total, 3,796 parathyroid glands were resected and histologically verified. Parathyroid glands varied in number. In 47 cases (5 %), one supernumerary (fifth) parathyroid was found, while in 19 cases (2 %) three parathyroid glands found. Superior glands were larger than inferior ones. However, there was no significant difference between the genders with respect to gland size. In 324 (8.5 %) out of 3,796, the glands were detected in an ectopic location: 7 (0.2 %) in the thyroid parenchyma, 79 (2 %) in different sites in the neck and 238 (6.3 %) in the mediastinum, 152 (4.1 %) of which were found in the upper and 86 (2.2 %) in the lower mediastinum. Significant anatomical variations of normal parathyroid glands may exist regarding number and location-knowledge that is essential for their successful identification and surgical management.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 11 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Unspecified 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 14 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,451,942
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Anatomical Science International
#47
of 239 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,261
of 167,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anatomical Science International
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 239 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them