| Title |
A Comparison of Graphical and Textual Presentations of Time Series Data to Support Medical Decision Making in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, June 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10877-005-0879-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna S. Law, Yvonne Freer, Jim Hunter, Robert H. Logie, Neil Mcintosh, John Quinn |
| Abstract |
To compare expert-generated textual summaries of physiological data with trend graphs, in terms of their ability to support neonatal Intensive Care Unit (ICU) staff in making decisions when presented with medical scenarios. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 62 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 8 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 27 | 36% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 18% |
| Engineering | 9 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#201
of 668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,300
of 57,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.