You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
An erythrocyte transketolase isoenzyme pattern associated with the Wernicke‐Korsakoff syndrome
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Clinical Investigation, March 2008
|
DOI | 10.1111/j.1365-2362.1984.tb01181.x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
PETER F. NIXON, M. JAN KACZMAREK, JILL TATE, RAY A. KERR, JOHN PRICE |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 2 | 33% |
Other | 2 | 33% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 17% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 33% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 33% |
Chemistry | 1 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2018.
All research outputs
#8,229,139
of 24,652,720 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Investigation
#639
of 1,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,525
of 86,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Investigation
#4
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,652,720 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,910 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.