↓ Skip to main content

Alcohol consumption and heart failure: A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Current Atherosclerosis Reports, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 789)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Alcohol consumption and heart failure: A systematic review
Published in
Current Atherosclerosis Reports, April 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11883-008-0017-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luc Djoussé, J. Michael Gaziano

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) remains a major public health issue. It is estimated that about 500,000 Americans per year are diagnosed with HF. Despite advanced medical and surgical treatments for HF, mortality after the onset of HF is still high, thereby underscoring the importance of primary prevention. Among modifiable lifestyle factors, alcohol consumption appears to play a role in the development of HF. Although excessive drinking has been known to lead to alcoholic cardiomyopathy and light-to-moderate drinking may confer some cardiovascular benefits, recent studies suggest it is not only the quantity, but also drinking patterns and genetic factors, that may influence the relation between alcohol consumption and cardiovascular disease. This article reviews current evidence on the association between alcohol consumption and HF.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Unknown 127 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 9%
Researcher 11 8%
Other 30 23%
Unknown 33 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 43 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2023.
All research outputs
#399,391
of 23,599,923 outputs
Outputs from Current Atherosclerosis Reports
#14
of 789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#647
of 83,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Atherosclerosis Reports
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,599,923 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them