↓ Skip to main content

Prodigious submarine landslides on the Hawaiian Ridge

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Geophysical Research, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
610 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prodigious submarine landslides on the Hawaiian Ridge
Published in
Journal of Geophysical Research, September 2012
DOI 10.1029/jb094ib12p17465
Authors

J. G. Moore, D. A. Clague, R. T. Holcomb, P. W. Lipman, W. R. Normark, M. E. Torresan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
New Caledonia 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 139 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 23%
Student > Master 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Professor 7 5%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 25 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 100 67%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Physics and Astronomy 3 2%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 33 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2019.
All research outputs
#6,754,462
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geophysical Research
#3,479
of 12,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,991
of 188,916 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geophysical Research
#990
of 4,351 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,916 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,351 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.