↓ Skip to main content

Eosinophils: Biological Properties and Role in Health and Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical & Experimental Allergy, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
9 patents
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
696 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
429 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Eosinophils: Biological Properties and Role in Health and Disease
Published in
Clinical & Experimental Allergy, April 2008
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.02958.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon P Hogan, Helene F Rosenberg, Redwan Moqbel, Simon Phipps, Paul S Foster, Paige Lacy, A Barry Kay, Marc E Rothenberg

Abstract

Eosinophils are pleiotropic multifunctional leukocytes involved in initiation and propagation of diverse inflammatory responses, as well as modulators of innate and adaptive immunity. In this review, the biology of eosinophils is summarized, focusing on transcriptional regulation of eosinophil differentiation, characterization of the growing properties of eosinophil granule proteins, surface proteins and pleiotropic mediators, and molecular mechanisms of eosinophil degranulation. New views on the role of eosinophils in homeostatic function are examined, including developmental biology and innate and adaptive immunity (as well as their interaction with mast cells and T cells) and their proposed role in disease processes including infections, asthma, and gastrointestinal disorders. Finally, strategies for targeted therapeutic intervention in eosinophil-mediated mucosal diseases are conceptualized.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 429 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 417 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 68 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 15%
Student > Master 59 14%
Student > Bachelor 59 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 6%
Other 69 16%
Unknown 84 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 98 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 94 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 50 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 41 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 3%
Other 36 8%
Unknown 99 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,822,629
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical & Experimental Allergy
#399
of 3,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,159
of 98,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical & Experimental Allergy
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,861 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.