| Title |
Prospective evaluation of patients refused admission to an intensive care unit: triage, futility and outcome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s001340101041 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gavin Joynt, Charles Gomersall, Peggy Tan, Anna Lee, Claudia Cheng, Elisa Wong |
| Abstract |
To evaluate factors associated with decisions to refuse ICU admission and to assess the outcome of refused patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 111 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 16% |
| Researcher | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 34 | 29% |
| Unknown | 24 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 52% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 27 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2018.
All research outputs
#15,318,515
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#3,998
of 4,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,007
of 242,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#73
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,973 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.