↓ Skip to main content

Who practices yoga? A systematic review of demographic, health-related, and psychosocial factors associated with yoga practice

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Behavioral Medicine, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
115 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
327 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Who practices yoga? A systematic review of demographic, health-related, and psychosocial factors associated with yoga practice
Published in
Journal of Behavioral Medicine, January 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10865-015-9618-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Crystal L. Park, Tosca Braun, Tamar Siegel

Abstract

Yoga has become increasingly popular in the US and around the world, yet because most yoga research is conducted as clinical trials or experiments, little is known about the characteristics and correlates of people who independently choose to practice yoga. We conducted a systematic review of this issue, identifying 55 studies and categorizing correlates of yoga practice into sociodemographics, psychosocial characteristics, and mental and physical well-being. Yoga use is greatest among women and those with higher socioeconomic status and appears favorably related to psychosocial factors such as coping and mindfulness. Yoga practice often relates to better subjective health and health behaviors but also with more distress and physical impairment. However, evidence is sparse and methodological limitations preclude drawing causal inferences. Nationally representative studies have minimally assessed yoga while studies with strong assessment of yoga practice (e.g., type, dose) are generally conducted with convenience samples. Almost all studies reviewed are cross-sectional and few control for potential confounding variables. We provide recommendations for future research to better understand the correlates of yoga practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 322 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 67 20%
Student > Bachelor 40 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 12%
Researcher 29 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 7%
Other 55 17%
Unknown 74 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 67 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 10%
Social Sciences 26 8%
Sports and Recreations 15 5%
Other 47 14%
Unknown 87 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2021.
All research outputs
#644,168
of 24,641,327 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#53
of 1,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,698
of 363,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,641,327 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.