↓ Skip to main content

Invasive alien plant species dynamics in the Himalayan region under climate change

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
Title
Invasive alien plant species dynamics in the Himalayan region under climate change
Published in
Ambio, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13280-018-1017-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pramod Lamsal, Lalit Kumar, Achyut Aryal, Kishor Atreya

Abstract

Climate change will impact the dynamics of invasive alien plant species (IAPS). However, the ability of IAPS under changing climate to invade mountain ecosystems, particularly the Himalayan region, is less known. This study investigates the current and future habitat of five IAPS of the Himalayan region using MaxEnt and two representative concentration pathways (RCPs). Two invasive species, Ageratum conyzoides and Parthenium hysterophorus, will lose overall suitable area by 2070, while Ageratina adenophora, Chromolaena odorata and Lantana camara will gain suitable areas and all of them will retain most of the current habitat as stable. The southern Himalayan foothills will mostly conserve species ecological niches, while suitability of all the five species will decrease with increasing elevation. Such invasion dynamics in the Himalayan region could have impacts on numerous ecosystems and their biota, ecosystem services and human well-being. Trans-boundary response strategies suitable to the local context of the region could buffer some of the likely invasion impacts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 170 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 17%
Student > Master 21 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 56 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 31%
Environmental Science 29 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 61 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2022.
All research outputs
#960,160
of 23,376,718 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#145
of 1,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,799
of 443,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#4
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,376,718 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.