↓ Skip to main content

Distribution of killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) and their HLA-C ligands in two Iranian populations

Overview of attention for article published in Immunogenetics, November 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Distribution of killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) and their HLA-C ligands in two Iranian populations
Published in
Immunogenetics, November 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00251-009-0408-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan E. Hiby, Maziar Ashrafian-Bonab, Lydia Farrell, Richard M. Single, Francois Balloux, Mary Carrington, Ashley Moffett

Abstract

Killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) gene frequencies vary between populations and contribute to functional variation in immune responses to viruses,autoimmunity and reproductive success. This study describes the frequency distribution of 12 variable KIR genes and their HLA-C ligands in two Iranian populations who have lived for many generations in different environments:t he Azerbaijanis at high altitude and the Jonobi people at sea level. The results are compared with those published for other human populations and a large group of English Caucasians. Differences were seen in KIR and HLA-C group frequencies, in linkage disequilibrium and inhibitory/activating KIR ratios between the groups. Similarities with geographically close populations in the frequencies of the KIR A and B haplotypes and KIR AA genotype reflected their common ancestry. The extreme variability of the KIR gene family and their HLA-C ligands is highlighted and their importance in defining differences between geographically and culturally isolated communities subject to different environmental pressures who come from the same ethnic grouping.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 3%
Netherlands 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 37 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 25%
Researcher 9 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Other 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 5 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2020.
All research outputs
#6,278,357
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Immunogenetics
#269
of 1,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,377
of 165,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunogenetics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,202 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them