| Title |
Draconibacterium filum sp. nov., a new species of the genus of Draconibacterium from sediment of the east coast of the Korean Peninsula
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10482-015-0396-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joo-Han Gwak, So-Jeong Kim, Man-Young Jung, Jong-Geol Kim, Seong Woon Roh, Kyung June Yim, Yong-Jae Lee, Song-Gun Kim, Soo-Je Park, Sung-Keun Rhee |
| Abstract |
A Gram-stain negative, long rod shaped, facultatively anaerobic bacterium, designated strain F2(T), was isolated from coastal sediment of the Korean Peninsula. Strain F2(T) was found to grow at 10-40 °C (optimum 30 °C), at pH 6.0-8.5 (optimum pH 7.5) and at 0.0-8.0 % (w/v) NaCl (optimum 3.0 %). Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequence showed that strain F2(T) is closely related to Draconibacterium orientale FH5(T) (with 97.9 % 16S rRNA gene similarity) of the family Prolixibacteraceae of the phylum Bacteroidetes. The major isoprenoid quinone was identified as MK-7 and the main fatty acids as iso-C15:0 (24.1 %), anteiso-C15:0 (15.4 %), C16:0 (10.7 %), iso-C17:0 3-OH (7.6 %) and iso-C16:0 3-OH (5.9 %). The major polar lipids were identified as phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylinositol and four unidentified polar lipids. The genomic DNA G+C content of strain F2(T) was determined to be 44.7 mol% and the DNA-DNA relatedness of strain F2(T) with D. orientale DSM 25947(T) was 34.6 ± 4.3 %. Nitrate reduction capability and cell morphology of strain F2(T) are distinct from those of the closest relative, D. orientale DSM 25947(T). Based on these properties, we propose strain F2(T) represents a novel species within the genus Draconibacterium, with the name Draconibacterium filum sp. nov. The type strain of D. filum is F2(T) (=KCTC 32486(T) = JCM 19986(T)). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 33% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 22% |
| Researcher | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 44% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2021.
All research outputs
#6,412,605
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#373
of 2,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,271
of 353,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#6
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,023 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.