↓ Skip to main content

Parliament, Congress, Dietを中心とする呼称についての諸問題

Overview of attention for article published in Current English Studies, September 1979
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Parliament, Congress, Dietを中心とする呼称についての諸問題
Published in
Current English Studies, September 1979
DOI 10.11293/jaces1962.1979.18_45
Authors

浅野 雅巳

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2020.
All research outputs
#6,757,283
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Current English Studies
#2
of 10 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,299
of 5,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current English Studies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one scored the same or higher as 8 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 5,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them