You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reporting Guidelines for Clinical Pharmacokinetic Studies: The ClinPK Statement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Pharmacokinetics, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40262-015-0236-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Salmaan Kanji, Meghan Hayes, Adam Ling, Larissa Shamseer, Clarence Chant, David J. Edwards, Scott Edwards, Mary H. H. Ensom, David R. Foster, Brian Hardy, Tyree H. Kiser, Charles la Porte, Jason A. Roberts, Rob Shulman, Scott Walker, Sheryl Zelenitsky, David Moher |
| Abstract |
Transparent reporting of all research is essential for assessing the validity of any study. Reporting guidelines are available and endorsed for many types of research but are lacking for clinical pharmacokinetic studies. Such tools promote the consistent reporting of a minimal set of information for end users, and facilitate knowledge translation of research. The objective of this study was to create a guideline to assist in the transparent and complete reporting of clinical pharmacokinetic studies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 38% |
| Chile | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 23 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 29% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 21 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 26 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2022.
All research outputs
#6,166,303
of 23,347,114 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacokinetics
#472
of 1,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,997
of 355,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacokinetics
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,347,114 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.